[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081231.141408.60544902.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:14:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rdreier@...co.com, mingo@...e.hu,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com,
deller@....de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, randolph@...sq.org,
sam@...nborg.org, dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: fix module loading failure of large kernel
modules (take 4)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:22:53 -0800 (PST)
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Adrian claimed that it was gcc-4.1.0 and 4.1.1 only. He proposed
> > banning them: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/5/444
>
> If it really is just those releases, then yes, considering the number of
> cases we apparently have, and considering how ugly it is in some cases to
> move the weak function anywhere else, maybe banning those versions is the
> proper thing to do.
>
> It probably won't hurt very many people - yeah, some people will be forced
> to upgrade, but I have this memory of early 4.1 having had other bugs
> anyway, so it's probably a good idea.
I think this is probably the best way to handle this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists