linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: stop kswapd's infinite loop at high order allocation take2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:54:34 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	"Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>,
	"wassim dagash" <wassim.dagash@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: stop kswapd's infinite loop at high order allocation take2

>>> So I want to balance zone's proportional free page.
>>> How about following ?
>>>
>>> if (nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
>>>   if (order != 0) {
>>>     order -=1;
>>>     sc.order -=1;
>>>   }
>>> }
>>>
>>> It prevents infinite loop and do best effort to make zone's
>>> proportional free page per order size good.
>>>
>>> It's just my opinion within my knowledge.
>>> If it have a problem, pz, explain me :)
>>
>> Please read Nick's expalin. it explain very kindly :)
>
> Hm. I read Nick's explain.
> I understand his point.
>
> Nick said,
> "A higher kswapd reclaim order shouldn't weaken kswapd
> postcondition for order-0 memory."
>
> My patch don't prevent order-0 memory reclaim. After all, it will do it.
> It also can do best effort to reclaim other order size.
>
> In this case, others order size reclaim is needless  ?

Yes, needless.

wakeup_kswapd() function mean
  - please make free memory until pages_high
  - and, I want to "order argument" conteniously pages.

then, shorter conteniously pages than "order argumet" pages aren't needed
by caller.

Unfortunately, your patch has more bad side effect.
high order shrink_zone() cause lumpy reclaim.
lumpy reclaim cause reclaim neighbor pages although it is active page.

needlessly active page reclaiming decrease system performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/