[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090102111452.GE20534@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:14:52 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
wassim dagash <wassim.dagash@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: stop kswapd's infinite loop at high order
allocation take2
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:52:02PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > > /*
> > > * Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be
> > > * rebalanced for high-order allocations in all zones.
> > > * At this point, if nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > > * it means the zones have been fully scanned and are still
> > > * not balanced. For high-order allocations, there is
> > > * little point trying all over again as kswapd may
> > > * infinite loop.
> > > *
> > > * Instead, recheck all watermarks at order-0 as they
> > > * are the most important. If watermarks are ok, kswapd will go
> > > * back to sleep. High-order users can still direct reclaim
> > > * if they wish.
> > > */
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > Excellent. I strongly like this and I hope merge it to my patch.
> > I'll resend new patch.
>
> Done.
>
Looks good, thanks.
>
>
> ==
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kswapd stop infinite loop at high order allocation
>
> Wassim Dagash reported following kswapd infinite loop problem.
>
> kswapd runs in some infinite loop trying to swap until order 10 of zone
> highmem is OK.... kswapd will continue to try to balance order 10 of zone
> highmem forever (or until someone release a very large chunk of highmem).
>
> For non order-0 allocations, the system may never be balanced due to
> fragmentation but kswapd should not infinitely loop as a result.
>
> Instead, recheck all watermarks at order-0 as they are the most important.
> If watermarks are ok, kswapd will go back to sleep.
>
>
> Reported-by: wassim dagash <wassim.dagash@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c 2008-12-25 08:26:37.000000000 +0900
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c 2009-01-01 01:56:02.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1872,6 +1872,23 @@ out:
>
> try_to_freeze();
>
> + /*
> + * Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be
> + * rebalanced for high-order allocations in all zones.
> + * At this point, if nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> + * it means the zones have been fully scanned and are still
> + * not balanced. For high-order allocations, there is
> + * little point trying all over again as kswapd may
> + * infinite loop.
> + *
> + * Instead, recheck all watermarks at order-0 as they
> + * are the most important. If watermarks are ok, kswapd will go
> + * back to sleep. High-order users can still direct reclaim
> + * if they wish.
> + */
> + if (nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> + order = sc.order = 0;
> +
> goto loop_again;
> }
>
>
>
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists