linux-kernel - Re: git-pull request for tip/cpus4096

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090102180942.GB10072@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:09:42 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-pull request for tip/cpus4096


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Here's the latest cpumask updates which includes the latest merge from 
> Rusty's cpumask tree.

Pulled into tip/cpus4096, thanks Mike.

Rusty already sent the pull request to Linus for his latest cpumask bits - 
is it fine if that goes upstream first and we do the second phase of the 
cpus4096 tree after that point?

Also, while testing tip/master i noticed that a couple of architectures 
wouldnt build due to cpumask changes:

   testing 21 architectures.
 
   testing       cris:  -git:  pass (  28),  -tip:  FAIL (  25)
   testing       m32r:  -git:  pass (  21),  -tip:  FAIL (  31)
 
both build failures go like this:
 
  /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c: In function 'find_last_bit':
  /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__fls'
  make[2]: *** [lib/find_last_bit.o] Error 1
  make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2
 
these architectures have no __fls() implementation ...
 
trouble should be expected on ~8 architectures:
 
  for N in arch/*; do [ -d $N ] && ( printf "%-20s: " $N; cd $N; dgrep __fls |
    wc -l; ); done | sort -t: -n -k +2
 
 arch/cris           : 0
 arch/frv            : 0
 arch/h8300          : 0
 arch/m32r           : 0
 arch/m68k           : 0
 arch/mn10300        : 0
 arch/um             : 0
 arch/xtensa         : 0
 arch/arm            : 1
 arch/avr32          : 1
 arch/blackfin       : 1
 arch/ia64           : 1
 arch/m68knommu      : 1
 arch/parisc         : 1
 arch/powerpc        : 1
 arch/s390           : 1
 arch/sh             : 1
 arch/x86            : 1
 arch/alpha          : 2
 arch/sparc          : 2
 arch/mips           : 5
 
 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/