linux-kernel - Re: git-pull request for tip/cpus4096

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <495E5BDF.6030204@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:24:31 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: git-pull request for tip/cpus4096

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> Here's the latest cpumask updates which includes the latest merge from 
>> Rusty's cpumask tree.
> 
> Pulled into tip/cpus4096, thanks Mike.
> 
> Rusty already sent the pull request to Linus for his latest cpumask bits - 
> is it fine if that goes upstream first and we do the second phase of the 
> cpus4096 tree after that point?

As in the bits included in this pull request, or as in the last set of cpumask
changes yet to be pushed to you?  (Either is fine with me, just let me know
what you want me to do.)

> 
> Also, while testing tip/master i noticed that a couple of architectures 
> wouldnt build due to cpumask changes:
> 
>    testing 21 architectures.
>  
>    testing       cris:  -git:  pass (  28),  -tip:  FAIL (  25)
>    testing       m32r:  -git:  pass (  21),  -tip:  FAIL (  31)
>  
> both build failures go like this:
>  
>   /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c: In function 'find_last_bit':
>   /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__fls'
>   make[2]: *** [lib/find_last_bit.o] Error 1
>   make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>   make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2
>  
> these architectures have no __fls() implementation ...
>  
> trouble should be expected on ~8 architectures:

I'll leave this to Rusty, as it's his baby.  (Is there an echo in here? ;-)

Thanks,
Mike

>  
>   for N in arch/*; do [ -d $N ] && ( printf "%-20s: " $N; cd $N; dgrep __fls |
>     wc -l; ); done | sort -t: -n -k +2
>  
>  arch/cris           : 0
>  arch/frv            : 0
>  arch/h8300          : 0
>  arch/m32r           : 0
>  arch/m68k           : 0
>  arch/mn10300        : 0
>  arch/um             : 0
>  arch/xtensa         : 0
>  arch/arm            : 1
>  arch/avr32          : 1
>  arch/blackfin       : 1
>  arch/ia64           : 1
>  arch/m68knommu      : 1
>  arch/parisc         : 1
>  arch/powerpc        : 1
>  arch/s390           : 1
>  arch/sh             : 1
>  arch/x86            : 1
>  arch/alpha          : 2
>  arch/sparc          : 2
>  arch/mips           : 5
>  
>  	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/