[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901022353.07200.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:53:06 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] linux/types.h: always export 64bit aligned defines
On Friday 02 January 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 16:59:35 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> > I mean that it may conflict with normal userspace which is the whole
> > point of being hidden.
>
> no, there is nothing in userspace that i know of that defines this type. i
> mentioned this in the changelog already.
What Andreas is trying to explain to you is that the definition of
__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES is that you would get no definitions that can
possibly pollute the name space, rather than not adding any known
conflicts (which we try with and without __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES).
The correct patch would add new definitions for __kernel_aligned_{u,be,le}64
types that can be safely used in public data structures even with
__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES set, and then add the existing names
for convenience for use inside of the kernel, as we do for all the
common types.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists