linux-kernel - Re: worth submitting a detailed EDID structure?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:55:56 -0800
From:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: worth submitting a detailed EDID structure?

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 09:08 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> just noticed the header file include/video/edid.h, which defines
> video EDID info as simply:
> 
>   struct edid_info {
>         unsigned char dummy[128];
>   };
> 
> a couple months back, i had to mess with EDID info and defined a
> detailed structure to manipulate EDID fields.  is it worth submitting
> that as a patch and union'ing that with the above?  not a big deal for
> me either way.

The KMS code already has detailed EDID structures in drm_edid.h, for
what it's worth.  We still need to get CEA extension bits ported over,
though.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric@...olt.net                         eric.anholt@...el.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)