linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] cpumask tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090103105208.GA19080@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:52:08 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree


* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >  - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
> > 
> >      arch/cris
> >      arch/frv
> >      arch/h8300
> >      arch/m32r
> >      arch/m68k
> >      arch/mn10300
> >      arch/xtensa
> 
> Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test?  You have
> to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.

yeah, i stopped the tests after the first two build failures - the rest is 
a grep result from arch/*/, that's why include/asm-m68k/ was left out.

> > Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via 
> > tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our 
> > remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict 
> > resolutions from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the 
> > ordering.
> 
> Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice.  As long as it ends 
> upstream, I'm a happy camper.

great - lets do it that way then. I have pulled your fixes into the 
cpus4096 tree:

 5ece5c5: xtensa: define __fls
 5c134da: mn10300: define __fls
 16a2062: m32r: define __fls
 9ddabc2: h8300: define __fls
 ee38e51: frv: define __fls
 0999769: cris: define __fls

Once we have figured out the CPU-hotplug lockdep splat (possibly due to 
Mike's changes not yours) i'll send it to Linus. Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/