linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] cpumask tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901031751.00076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:50:59 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree

On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
> 
>      arch/cris
>      arch/frv
>      arch/h8300
>      arch/m32r
>      arch/m68k
>      arch/mn10300
>      arch/xtensa

Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test?  You have
to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.

> Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via 
> tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our 
> remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict resolutions 
> from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the ordering.

Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice.  As long as it ends upstream,
I'm a happy camper.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/