[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090105025300.3afbec23@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:53:00 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:01:34 +1100
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Arjan.
>
> Great work, and valuable too. I'm just wondering if the header file
> name "async.h" is a little too generic? Something like async_init.h
> perhaps?
>
while the users I have in mind are during init, the concept and
infrastructure of asynchronous function calls is by no means limited to
that use case... I hope there are many other uses for this :)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists