[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231154305.8179.148.camel@nigel-laptop>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:18:25 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls
Hi.
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 02:53 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:01:34 +1100
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-lkml@...a.org.au> wrote:
>
> > Hi Arjan.
> >
> > Great work, and valuable too. I'm just wondering if the header file
> > name "async.h" is a little too generic? Something like async_init.h
> > perhaps?
> >
>
> while the users I have in mind are during init, the concept and
> infrastructure of asynchronous function calls is by no means limited to
> that use case... I hope there are many other uses for this :)
Okee doke. How about async_fn or something like that then? It's just
that there's async I/O and no doubt other async stuff I haven't thought
of. Still, it's a relatively minor point.
Night!
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists