[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510901051347r6593d0fmd64702b1689716c1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:47:22 +0100
From: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: "Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 19:54, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = {
>> + .attr = {.name = "nonrot", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR },
>> + .show = queue_nonrot_show,
>> + .store = queue_nonrot_store,
>> +};
>> +
>
> Lets please use a better name for export reasons, non-rotational is a
> lot better. Nobody will know what nonrot means :-)
What's that negation good for? Can't we just have "rotational", like
we have "removable" and not "non-removable"? :)
Thanks?
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists