linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090106073515.GY32491@kernel.dk>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:35:15 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs

On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 19:54, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> >> +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = {
> >> +     .attr = {.name = "nonrot", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR },
> >> +     .show = queue_nonrot_show,
> >> +     .store = queue_nonrot_store,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >
> > Lets please use a better name for export reasons, non-rotational is a
> > lot better. Nobody will know what nonrot means :-)
> 
> What's that negation good for? Can't we just have "rotational", like
> we have "removable" and not "non-removable"? :)

Non-rotational is the term typically used, since rotational is the norm
(still). So I think the negation actually makes sense in this case :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/