[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090106121802.GA7071@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:18:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: setup.c fix style problems
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > the x86-local declarations in smp.h should probably be moved into a
> > separate smp_x86.h file - to avoid such trouble.
> >
>
> I think we do not need to make any new files only thing we need is to
> rearrange stuff between existing files.
>
> Currently there is no such protocol, If we follow this logic then it
> will very easy for us to maintain things:
>
> CONFIG_SMP -> asm/smp.h
> CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC -> asm/apic.h
> CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC -> asm/io_apic.h
yep.
> And if you want then I will give strict instructions so that we will
> never face these problems again, like :-
>
> asm/smp.h:
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> #error "Including wrong file, why you need smp.h for Uniprocessor"
> #else
> ...
> #endif
>
> Similarly for asm/apic.h and asm/io_apic.h
the smp.h change would work, agreed - but it's not really good for things
like apic.h and io_apic.h - often apic.h is included to pick up init and
various callback prototypes - which exist on !CONFIG_X96_IO_APIC too.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists