[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090106125704.GC20407@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:57:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: irqnr fallout in gpiolib on sparc32
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:55:08 +0100
>
> > * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Dave has mentioned this but we are not working actively on it yet.
> >
> > would be cool to do it - i think sparc32 is one of the last major
> > physical architectures to not be on genirq -
>
> m68k remains to be converted over to genirq as well
yeah - but m68k has been a holdout from pretty much every optional core
kernel facility that has been introduced in the past 5-10 years. So if
sparc32 converts to genirq we have a stronger case for saying:
"Convert, else ..."
[ where the three dots stands for something not nice. ]
Sparc32 on the other hand had a clean IRQ layer long before x86 found its
desire for a clean genirq layer - so genirq is a nuisance for Sparc32 at
best and it deserves none of the not nice actions. What i am hoping for is
that perhaps the Sparc unification changed that equation.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists