linux-kernel - Re: irqnr fallout in gpiolib on sparc32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090106.082913.97432854.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:29:13 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	sam@...nborg.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: irqnr fallout in gpiolib on sparc32

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:57:04 +0100

> Sparc32 on the other hand had a clean IRQ layer long before x86 found its 
> desire for a clean genirq layer - so genirq is a nuisance for Sparc32 at 
> best and it deserves none of the not nice actions. What i am hoping for is 
> that perhaps the Sparc unification changed that equation.

Not really, the unificiation didn't change much in this area.  That
doesn't change the fact that I do intend to genirq'ify sparc32 some
time soon. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/