| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090106034845.GD3512@agk.fab.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:48:45 +0000 From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com> To: crquan@...il.com Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>, device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>, "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [git pull] device-mapper patches for 2.6.29 On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:32:51AM +0800, Cheng Renquan (程任全) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:15:58AM +0800, Cheng Renquan (程任全) wrote: > >> So now maybe we can add a null macro to module_refcount if > >> CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD undefined? > > Do we even need the test at all? > So you mean add "#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD ..." to dm-target.c? I > can do that, but I really don't know a better solution without > conditional compiling? I mean under what set of circumstances could the test of the module refcount here fail, and if the test was simply removed are there any cases where that would matter? Alasdair -- agk@...hat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists