[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062056540.3057@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:01:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: introduce asm/swab.h
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Was this tested ? I see no arch maintainer signed-off here, it appears
> to at least break ppc32, and contains hunks that paulus says were
> explicitely nacked (removing of our ld_* macros) etc...
It did no such thing. It just moved the file.
Use
git show -M -B 156ca2bbf6503a02d7d6829886ce381d572de66e
to see how <asm/swab.h> is just the old <asm/byteorder.h> renamed, and
with some stuff moved around. Eg it contains:
-#define __BIG_ENDIAN
-#include <linux/byteorder.h>
because now the <asm/byteorder.h> header file on powerpc will just do
+#include <asm/swab.h>
+#include <linux/byteorder/big_endian.h>
instead of doing that __BIG_ENDIAN define and conditionals that didn't
work with user space.
So it really should be a no-op. And no, I'm not reverting it, because
I guarantee that reverting it won't result in a working build - the broken
<linux/byteorder.h> file no longer exists (and will not be re-instated).
So I'd suggest testing it, and if it really doesn't work, trying to figure
out why. Because a revert won't be helping.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists