[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901070024410.26118@xanadu.home>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:26:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: introduce asm/swab.h
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > Even if fixing that to use __swab32() instead, then it fails because
> > > this is defined after it's used. I worked around it using fswab in
> > > there instead.
> >
> > That's the same patch I just sent out (but you changed comments too), so I
> > obviously agree.
> >
> > x86 didn't see this (even in 32-bit mode) because it doesn't use that odd
> > __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ case, but does the 64-bit swab with native code.
> >
> > Can you also verify that it works for you (not just compiles), just so
> > that I can commit it?
>
> Tested OK on ARM (using LE mode with networking, etc.)
Well, given that I have no way to test any code path including
be64_to_cpu() and its opposite, my testing is only valid for
compilation issues.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists