[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062122100.3057@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:37:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: introduce asm/swab.h
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Can you also verify that it works for you (not just compiles), just so
> > that I can commit it?
>
> Tested OK on ARM (using LE mode with networking, etc.)
Ok, I committed it as a quick-fix. I'm not sure that is necessarily the
final one, but at least it is better than not compiling.
For example, it's kind of silly to use two __fswab32()'s with other
oddness if that one just falls back on __constant_swab32: maybe we'd want
to make sure that we'd use ___constant_swab64() in that case, and only do
the whole __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ if we really have a __arch_swab32()
function.
Of course, I do hope that anybody who #defines __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ already
has that __arch_swab32() thing, so it's likely fine.
I also wonder whether gcc generates better code with a union than with
that 64-bit math...
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists