[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901062145340.25237@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:52:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
roel.kluin@...il.com, pq@....fi, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ring-buffer: rename debugfs file tracing_on to
writing_enabled
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:33:39 -0500
>
> There's no corresponding documentation update needed?
I've fallen a little behind in the documentation. I wanted to see what got
pulled in before updating ftrace.txt. But you are correct, I probably
should add the documentation updates along with the patches.
But unfortunately, I'm a bit lazy. I like to wait and see what makes it to
mainline, and then write a patch to update ftrace.txt to reflect that. It
lets me do it in one sitting, instead of doing it for each change.
Honestly, I think I document it better that way. If I document right after
writing the code, I do it with too much knowledge of the code, and my
writing is confusing for others. If I wait to document, I forget what I
did, and have to relearn what I wrote, and then I have a better
perspective of what others will want to know.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists