[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901062152290.25237@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:53:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
roel.kluin@...il.com, pq@....fi, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/ftrace: fix a memory leak in stat tracing
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:33:40 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > static int stat_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > {
> > - struct trace_stat_list *l = list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);
> > - return current_tracer.stat_show(s, l->stat);
> > + struct trace_stat_list *entry =
> > + list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);
> > +
> > + return current_tracer.stat_show(s, entry->stat);
> > }
>
> Rather than jumping through weird 80-column hoops, one can just do:
>
> struct trace_stat_list *entry;
>
> ...
>
> entry = list_entry(v, struct trace_stat_list, list);
OK, this is Frederics work. I'll submit a separate clean up patch.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists