[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49673D02.6000002@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:03:14 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: use WARN_ON_ONCE on hot paths
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2009/1/9 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>:
>> Convert WARN_ON() on command issue/completion paths to WARN_ON_ONCE()
>> so that libata doesn't spam the machine even when one of those
>> conditions triggers repeatedly.
>>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I've not yet applied this patch - but now I'm getting these WARNS on my T61:
> (commit: 2150edc6c5cf00f7adb54538b9ea2a3e9cedca3f)
>
> Is this patch solving the problem or just hiding warnings ?
Hiding warnings. As Tejun noted in another email, this condition should
not be happening in the first place.
If I had to guess, I would say that Arjan's patches assume it is OK to
treat two ports on a single IDE controller as completely independent,
when that is not really the reality of the hardware.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists