[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090111205008.db0a410e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:50:08 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
travis@....com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
Hi Dave,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:31:03 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> I'm surprised linux-next builds didn't catch this.
So am I. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/compiler/5/ shows my latest
builds of both linux-next and Linus' tree are OK for defconfig and
allnoconfig (allmodconfig fails for a different reason).
What is different about the failing config (compiler)? Are there other
configs it would be sensible to build test?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists