[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090111121315.GE27796@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:13:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:50:08 +1100
>
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:31:03 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm surprised linux-next builds didn't catch this.
> >
> > So am I. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/compiler/5/ shows my latest
> > builds of both linux-next and Linus' tree are OK for defconfig and
> > allnoconfig (allmodconfig fails for a different reason).
> >
> > What is different about the failing config (compiler)? Are there other
> > configs it would be sensible to build test?
>
> Maybe you don't have NUMA enabled in the test build configs.
> I hit it during an allmodconfig.
>
> Anyways this fixes it, someone please apply:
>
> sparc64: Fix cpumask related build failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
applied it to tip/core/urgent and will send it to Linus later today.
Thanks David!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists