[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090111034933.GB28520@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:49:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Cheng Renquan <crquan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: check CONFIG_FREEZER instead of CONFIG_PM
* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Check CONFIG_FREEZER instead of CONFIG_PM because kprobe booster
> > > depends on freeze_processes() and thaw_processes() when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.
> > >
> > > This fixes a linkage error which occurs when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, CONFIG_PM=y
> > > and CONFIG_FREEZER=n.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Cheng Renquan <crquan@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > > ---
> > > arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> > > kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > looks good, the x86 bits:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> man, we have too many config options:-)
Agreed :-/
The idea is that of learning-via-pain: many config options cause many
fixes, which causes people to reduce config options. At least that's the
theory ;-) /me looks at his .config size and wonders
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists