lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:57:23 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: checkpatch warning of struct indentation


Hi,

I'm now seeing the following warnings from checkpatch:

#325: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:21:
+	void 			*stat;

ERROR: "foo 	*bar" should be "foo *bar"
#334: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:27:
+	struct tracer_stat 	*ts;

ERROR: "foo		*bar" should be "foo	*bar"
#337: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:30:
+	struct dentry		*file;

This is for:

struct tracer_stat_session {
        struct list_head        session_list;
        struct tracer_stat      *ts;
        struct list_head        stat_list;
        struct mutex            stat_mutex;
        struct dentry           *file;
};

Which looks a hell of a lot better than:

struct tracer_stat_session {
        struct list_head session_list;
        struct tracer_stat *ts;
        struct list_head stat_list;
        struct mutex stat_mutex;
        struct dentry *file;
};

We probably do not want to warn on such things.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ