[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496B8A79.4060309@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:22:49 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: xen: fix too early kmalloc call
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:53:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: xen: fix too early kmalloc call
>>>
>>> From: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
>>>
>>> Impact: fixes bootup of xen.
>>>
>>> Christophe reported the following problem:
>>>
>>>> (basically it seems that SLAB is not yet up, with earlyprintk it is
>>>> giving me an Oops in __kmalloc before)
>>> Replace call to kmalloc with alloc_bootmem.
>>>
>>> Also from Christophe:
>>>> (me)
>>>>> Or I could copy the text and submit it as a new patch?
>>>> Yes, I would prefer that. Also, my commit message was not really
>>>> following Kernel standards and it's only a very simple change.
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>> i've applied the fix to tip/cpus4096, in the form below.
>>
>> Please submit clean log messages. Your commit description was confused -
>> the patch is From: Christophe, but the message talks about Christophe in
>> the third person. Also, it included conversational bits that have no
>> value for the Git history.
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>> -------------------->
>>> >From 28e08861b9afab4168b758fb7b95aa7a4da0f668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:46:23 -0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] xen: fix too early kmalloc call
>>
>> Impact: fix bootup crash on xen guests
>>
>> SLAB is not yet up, with earlyprintk it is giving me an Oops in __kmalloc.
>>
>> Replace call to kmalloc() with alloc_bootmem().
>>
>> Reported-by: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/events.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
>> index ed7527b..3141e14 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/irq.h>
>> @@ -831,8 +832,8 @@ void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
>> int i;
>> size_t size = nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(struct cpu_evtchn_s);
>>
>> - cpu_evtchn_mask_p = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - BUG_ON(cpu_evtchn_mask == NULL);
>> + cpu_evtchn_mask_p = alloc_bootmem(size);
>> + BUG_ON(cpu_evtchn_mask_p == NULL);
>
> Impossible condition :-) alloc_bootmem() crashes before you could
> catch it here.
>
> Hannes
Yes, that's picked up in a subsequent patch (I didn't catch it the
first time I reviewed it as well.) There appears to be a queue of
patches for Xen coming, so this last "memory reduction patch" will
follow (or be included with) those.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists