[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090112182038.GA10392@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:20:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch warning of struct indentation
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm now seeing the following warnings from checkpatch:
>
> #325: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:21:
> + void *stat;
>
> ERROR: "foo *bar" should be "foo *bar"
> #334: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:27:
> + struct tracer_stat *ts;
>
> ERROR: "foo *bar" should be "foo *bar"
> #337: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_stat.c:30:
> + struct dentry *file;
>
> This is for:
>
> struct tracer_stat_session {
> struct list_head session_list;
> struct tracer_stat *ts;
> struct list_head stat_list;
> struct mutex stat_mutex;
> struct dentry *file;
> };
>
> Which looks a hell of a lot better than:
>
> struct tracer_stat_session {
> struct list_head session_list;
> struct tracer_stat *ts;
> struct list_head stat_list;
> struct mutex stat_mutex;
> struct dentry *file;
> };
>
> We probably do not want to warn on such things.
yeah, those warnings look bogus.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists