linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231787958.6383.18.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:19:18 -0600
From:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sfrench@...ba.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 12:58 -0600, Steve French wrote:
> There is not just the cifs md5 one (which has been around a long
> time), but an md5_init (static) in crypto and the new one in rt.  The
> addition of the new one (rt md5_init) causes the build problem.   It
> would be nice if we could use the same md5 routines though ... last
> time we checked the crypto one was not well suited for calculating
> signatures as a network fs would do though.

Is that due to the byte-swapping?  Can the cifs and rt* drivers use the
same code.  rt28[67]0/common/md5.c are identical files.  In fact those
"common" directories should probably be combined into a single truly
common directory.

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Some people took me at my word and so we have the 2.6.30 code starting to
> >> trickle in already.
> >
> >
> >
> > When CIFS is built-in (=y) and staging/rt28[67]0 =y, there are multiple
> > definitions of:
> >
> > build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1d8ad0): multiple definition of `MD5Init'
> > build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1dbb30): multiple definition of `MD5Update'
> > build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1db9b0): multiple definition of `MD5Final'
> >
> > all of which need to have more unique identifiers for their global
> > symbols (e.g., rt28_md5_init, cifs_md5_init, foo, blah, bar).
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~Randy
> >
> 
> 
> 
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/