[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650901121123i1765dc3fye3ce636c91dd25bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:23:07 -0600
From: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
To: "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: "Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sfrench@...ba.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
Is there some magic compile option alternative (other than renaming
the function, which may be ok, since others probably don't depend on
it)? MD5Init is used outside fs/cifs/md5.c so can't be static
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:58:42PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
>> There is not just the cifs md5 one (which has been around a long
>> time), but an md5_init (static) in crypto and the new one in rt. The
>> addition of the new one (rt md5_init) causes the build problem. It
>> would be nice if we could use the same md5 routines though ... last
>> time we checked the crypto one was not well suited for calculating
>> signatures as a network fs would do though.
>
> I'll fix up the staging rt drivers to not do this, but cifs shouldn't be
> declaring such functions as globals either :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists