[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090113185013.GB14470@localhost>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:50:13 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - fix export private data to
userspace
[Harvey Harrison - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:37:12AM -0800]
| On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 21:34 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > Impact: cleanup
|
| > 4) setup.h - COMMAND_LINE_SIZE saved for userspace, bootloaders
| > could use it.
|
| Doesn't this need to be (at least) _COMMAND_LINE_SIZE to avoid
| polluting the namespace, not sure it can be changed though as the
| horse is already out of the barn.
|
| Harvey
|
I was concerning more about lilo side, is it use this param.
So here is a link
http://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2006-q3/msg18665.html
is seems LILO has it's own definition for COMMAND_LINE_SIZE.
On the other hand it touches boot protocol. Peter should know
if it safe to hide/change COMMAND_LINE_SIZE. Peter?
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists