linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:35:32 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sfrench@...ba.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:27:49 CST, Dave Kleikamp said:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 21:01 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:07:48 CST, Steve French said:
> > 
> > > I have changed the names of cifs's md5 functions in the cifs-2.6.git tree
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/md5.h b/fs/cifs/md5.h
> > > index f7d4f41..6fba8cb 100644
> > 
> > I presume there will be another git commit immediately following to fix
> > up the call sites?
> 
> The git tree has the entire fix.  Steve's post just contained a piece of
> it.

Oh, OK. Thanks for verifying that for those of us playing along at home. ;)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped