[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496D8CEB.5060402@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:57:47 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mingo@...e.hu,
travis@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, steiner@....com, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET linux-2.6-x86:tip] x86: make percpu offsets zero-based
on SMP
Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> I think the two changes aren't exclusive at all. The order of things
> could be different but in the end, yeah, zero-based percpu symbols w/
> mostly empty pda is the goal.
>
>> Once the PDA is empty, I'll base %gs at the start of the per-cpu
>> area. I've been working out the bugs with the last patch
>> (zero-basing the percpu area) before submitting, but I probably
>> won't have the time until this weekend to polish it off. I could
>> submit all but the last patch if you'd like.
>
> Any chance you can rebase those patches on top of mine? If you don't
> have time, just send them to me, I'll try to integrate them this week.
>
A merged tree here would be absolutely wonderful. I've kept an eye on
the discussion so far, but it looks like you guys are handling it fine.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists