[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114065359.GA16044@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:53:59 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Use cryptd(%s) as cryptd-ed algorithm name instead of %s
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:44:08PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Because:
>
> 1. if use %s, you can only request cryptd(<driver name>), not
> cryptd(<alg name>), because generated new algorithm instance has
> algorithm name: <alg name> and driver name cryptd(<driver name>).
This is intentional. For the purposes we talked about we should
be requesting cryptd(<driver name>), as otherwise you may end up
with someone else's AES algorithm as the base.
> 2. Generated cryptd-ed algorithm will have the same algorithm name and
> higher priority, but some user may not want to use cryptd-ed
> version.
The priority shouldn't be an issue in our case since the AES-NI
algorithm should register itself as an ablkcipher with an even
higher priority.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists