[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114144602.GG10720@gambetta>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:46:02 +0100
From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@...og.eu>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dst@...emap.net
Subject: Re: [4/7] dst: thread pool.
Hi Evgeniy,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:05:30AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
[...]
> +void thread_pool_del_worker(struct thread_pool *p)
> +{
> + struct thread_pool_worker *w = NULL;
> +
> + while (!w) {
> + wait_event(p->wait, !list_empty(&p->ready_list) || !p->thread_num);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What's the purpose of !p->thread_num here? Is there an exit case missing
in the loop below?
> +
> + dprintk("%s: locking list_empty: %d, thread_num: %d.\n",
> + __func__, list_empty(&p->ready_list), p->thread_num);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&p->thread_lock);
> + if (!list_empty(&p->ready_list)) {
> + w = list_first_entry(&p->ready_list,
> + struct thread_pool_worker,
> + worker_entry);
> +
> + dprintk("%s: deleting w: %p, thread_num: %d, list: %p [%p.%p].\n",
> + __func__, w, p->thread_num, &p->ready_list,
> + p->ready_list.prev, p->ready_list.next);
> +
> + p->thread_num--;
> + list_del(&w->worker_entry);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&p->thread_lock);
> + }
> +
> + if (w)
> + thread_pool_exit_worker(w);
> + dprintk("%s: deleted w: %p, thread_num: %d.\n",
> + __func__, w, p->thread_num);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists