[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114144115.GF10720@gambetta>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:41:15 +0100
From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@...og.eu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] tlb flush_data: replace per_cpu with an array
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > It also would save some memory
> > > on most distros out there (Ubuntu x86_64 has NR_CPUS=64 by default).
>
> As pointed out several times this claim in the changelog is incorrect.
> Please fix it.
>
> A correct description would be:
>
> - This patch wastes memory of one configured cache line for each CPU
> on systems with less than 8 cores (e.g. 896 bytes on a 1 core system
> with CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU/ cache line size 128)
> It saves some memory on systems with more than 8 cores (one cache
> line size for each core above 8)
To be fair, it also depends on whenever HOTPLUG_CPU is on or not (if it
is we allocate NR_CPUS percpu sections). In that case, which is Ubuntu's
and Fedora's, we do save memory.
This would make for a fairly long changelog, how about a link to this
thread, and removing the NR_CPUS bit?
Regards,
Frederik
>
> -Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists