[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114152423.GA24562@frolo.macqel>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:24:23 +0100
From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
To: Rogan Dawes <lists@...es.za.net>
Cc: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux kernel without file system
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:57:09PM +0200, Rogan Dawes wrote:
> Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Rogan Dawes wrote:
> >> Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Keeping thinking about it, I now think that my 'application program'
> >>> (basically a serial-to-ethernet converter) should be a kernel thread,
> >>> because of the small memory constraints.
> >>>
> >>> The question is thus how to access the serial lines from a kernel thread.
> >>>
> >>> Philippe
> >> If your constraints are that severe, perhaps you should be investigating
> >> other solutions. e.g. eCos?
> >
> > I like to reuse (and contribute to) the linux drivers and kernel.
> >
> >> Linux doesn't ALWAYS have to be the answer :-)
> >
> > No ? :)
> >
> > Philippe
> >
>
> Ok, in that case, perhaps you should explain exactly what your
> constraints are (target board, max memory/flash, etc), and maybe folks
> will be able to provide more sensible answers.
if possible, mcf52236 (256k flash 32k sram in chip) :)
kernel+uapplication XIP in flash
they seems to push something called utasker
Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists