[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114154057.GC32082@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:40:57 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL -tip] fixed few make headers_check warnings
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:49:21PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Ingo,
> >
> > Please pull these patches. Earlier I also floated these patches so that
> > I can get some feedback.
>
> Sam, Andrew, David, what's your workflow preference for these bits?
>
> While they are oneliners and i could create a separate branch for these
> and pull Jaswinder's tree (and do build coverage to make sure there's no
> surprised on any arch), it's really up to the maintainers of these files
> to decide on the workflow.
>
> I'd lean towards doing this via the individual maintainers and/or -mm, but
> no strong feelings ...
As they are one-liners for the most part I am fine with you handling
them in a eparate branch.
It is far better than I queue them up for at least two weeks before I
can give the kernel a bit of attention again.
Obviously it would be better if the Maintainers took them but history
tells us we cannot rely on that for all areas.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists