[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496E2059.8010904@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:26:49 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Arthur Jones <ajones@...erbed.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"sct@...hat.com" <sct@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:14:11PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This looks sane to me, and it does fix the below testcase.
>>
>> Care to formally propose it?
>
> Can we confirm what is being proposed? From following this thread, I
> think what folks are suggesting is:
>
> 1) Revert the current "ext3/4: wait on all pending ocmmits in ext3/4_sync_fs"
>
> 2) Apply Jan's patch "jbd[2]: Fix return value of journal_start_commit()"
The above seems like the right plan to me. It should address the
kernel.org bug about IO on idle partitions.
> 3) Also apply Jan's patch "jbd2: Skip commit of a transaction without
> any buffers" since it appears to be a good optimization (although it's
> not clear it would happen once we revert (1), above.
Maybe not yet, it could probably use more testing/review/soak.
-Eric
> - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists