[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496E206A.6020003@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:27:06 -0500
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v12][PATCH 13/14] Checkpoint multiple processes
Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> +/* count number of tasks in tree (and optionally fill pid's in array) */
>> +static int cr_tree_count_tasks(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *root = ctx->root_task;
>> + struct task_struct *task = root;
>> + struct task_struct *parent = NULL;
>> + struct task_struct **tasks_arr = ctx->tasks_arr;
>> + int tasks_nr = ctx->tasks_nr;
>> + int nr = 0;
>> +
>> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
>> +
>> + /* count tasks via DFS scan of the tree */
>> + while (1) {
>> + if (tasks_arr) {
>> + /* unlikely, but ... */
>> + if (nr == tasks_nr)
>> + return -EBUSY; /* cleanup in cr_ctx_free() */
>
> Returns without unlocking tasklist_lock?
>
Thanks. Will fix.
Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists