linux-kernel - Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:23:57 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!

On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:35:02 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov said:

> It is exactly the purpose of the patch: to kill what is requested to be
> killed.
> 
> I wonder how do you expect users to guess via libastral that even
> adjusted score does not work, since it happens that task is so special,
> that it can not be killed :)

What does your patch do if one user has a process 'foo' that they're willing
to have die first, and a process 'bar' that absolutely can't be killed..

Meanwhile, another user has a 'must die first' process 'bar', and a 'must not
die' process 'foo'.

Methinks your patch needs libastral as well?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped