linux-kernel - Re: deadlocks if use htb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090115095454.GA5461@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:54:54 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>
Cc:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	Chris Caputo <ccaputo@....net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: deadlocks if use htb

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:40:59PM +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
...
> Jarek, i easy can test patch 4 without 2+3 if it needed at heavy
> production server. I use dynamic routing and if server crashed - traffic
> go to another pc after few seconds. I not test it because you say that
> its not needed if for me help 3+2. I apply it today and test at few servers.

Yes, I thought it's so rare we can wait till 2.6.29, while you had this
patched, and Denys seemed to not see it after changing his sever. But
I have changed my mind after seeing Chris's report...

I'm not sure if Peter would recomend something better yet, so I guess
you could wait with this testing for his opinion.

Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/