[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901151157.13340.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:57:13 +0200
From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>,
Chris Caputo <ccaputo@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: deadlocks if use htb
I didn't notice a bug, just because all that time i was using it without
hrtimers (because of nmi_watchdog).
On Thursday 15 January 2009 11:54:54 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:40:59PM +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
> ...
>
> > Jarek, i easy can test patch 4 without 2+3 if it needed at heavy
> > production server. I use dynamic routing and if server crashed - traffic
> > go to another pc after few seconds. I not test it because you say that
> > its not needed if for me help 3+2. I apply it today and test at few
> > servers.
>
> Yes, I thought it's so rare we can wait till 2.6.29, while you had this
> patched, and Denys seemed to not see it after changing his sever. But
> I have changed my mind after seeing Chris's report...
>
> I'm not sure if Peter would recomend something better yet, so I guess
> you could wait with this testing for his opinion.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists