[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090115105116.GG30358@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-01-15 19:21:20]:
>
> I'm sorry that I couldn't work so much, this week.
> No much updates but I think all comments I got are applied.
>
> About memcg part, I'll wait for that all Nishimura's fixes go ahead.
> If cgroup part looks good, please Ack. I added CC to Andrew Morton for that part.
>
> changes from previous series
> - dropeed a fix to OOM KILL (will reschedule)
> - dropped a fix to -EBUSY (will reschedule)
> - added css_is_populated()
> - added hierarchy_stat patch
>
> Known my homework is
> - resize_limit should return -EBUSY. (Li Zefan reported.)
>
> Andrew, I'll CC: you [1/4] and [2/4]. But no explicit Acked-by yet to any patches.
>
Kamezawa-San, like you've suggested earlier, I think it is important
to split up the fixes from the development patches. I wonder if we
should start marking all patches with BUGFIX for bug fixes, so that we
can prioritize those first.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists