linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090115195834.e07e604d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:58:34 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
	"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:16 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-01-15 19:21:20]:
> 
> > 
> > I'm sorry that I couldn't work so much, this week.
> > No much updates but I think all comments I got are applied.
> > 
> > About memcg part, I'll wait for that all Nishimura's fixes go ahead.
> > If cgroup part looks good, please Ack. I added CC to Andrew Morton for that part.
> > 
> > changes from previous series
> >   - dropeed a fix to OOM KILL   (will reschedule)
> >   - dropped a fix to -EBUSY     (will reschedule)
> >   - added css_is_populated()
> >   - added hierarchy_stat patch
> > 
> > Known my homework is
> >   - resize_limit should return -EBUSY. (Li Zefan reported.)
> > 
> > Andrew, I'll CC: you [1/4] and [2/4]. But no explicit Acked-by yet to any patches.
> >
> 
> Kamezawa-San, like you've suggested earlier, I think it is important
> to split up the fixes from the development patches. I wonder if we
> should start marking all patches with BUGFIX for bug fixes, so that we
> can prioritize those first.
>  
Ah yes. I'll do that from next post. 

patch [1/4] and [2/4] doesnt modify memcg at all. So, I added Andrew to CC.
It's a new feature for cgroup.

for memcg part. of course, I'll wait for all Nishimura's fixes goes to -rc.

patch [3/4] will remove most of them, crazy maze of hierarchical reclaim.
patch [4/4] is written for demonstration. but the output seems atractive.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/