[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090114215810.674569fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:58:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dst@...emap.net, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [4/7] dst: thread pool.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:05:30 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> wrote:
> Kernel currently does not allow to queue work into some entity which
> will perform it in the process context and have simple way to extend
> number of worker and work with them not as separate objects, but with
> pool as a whole. So thread pool model was implemented in the DST.
>
> Thread pool abstraction allows to schedule a work to be performed
> on behalf of kernel thread. One does not operate with threads itself,
> instead user provides setup and cleanup callbacks for thread pool itself,
> and action and cleanup callbacks for each submitted work.
>
> Each worker has private data initialized at creation time and data,
> provided by user at scheduling time.
>
> When action is being performed, thread can not be used by other users,
> instead they will sleep until there is free thread to pick their work.
>
> Thread pool is used for crypto processing of incoming and outgoing IO
> requests to reduce the overall overhead.
This is at least our fourth thread pool implementation, not counting
kernel/workqueue.c:
1: pdflush
2: David Howells' "slow work" infrastructure
3: Arjan van de Ven's kernel/async.c
4: Your "dst thread pool"
Guys, please. Let's get our act together here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists