[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901151946140.18861@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:48:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: add stack trace to function tracer
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Produces the following in /debug/tracing/trace:
>
> kjournald-702 [001] 135.673060: io_schedule <-sync_buffer
> kjournald-702 [002] 135.673671:
> <= sync_buffer
> <= __wait_on_bit
> <= out_of_line_wait_on_bit
> <= __wait_on_buffer
> <= sync_dirty_buffer
> <= journal_commit_transaction
> <= kjournald
Note, the above is from two different CPUS. This is because I did not want
to messy up the current function trace with more branches. I took the easy
way out. I simply registered another tracer to the function tracer to dump
out the trace.
I have an idea how to fix it. I'll work on a solution now.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists