[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090116131051.GM5421@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:10:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: updates to tip
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 2009/1/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Ingo,
> >>
> >> The first patch is critical, and needs to stay with trace_output.c Not
> >> that critical since trace_output.c is not in mainline yet.
> >>
> >> The second patch gives the ability to stack trace functions. I've been
> >> leery about adding this and still keep it a separate option from the
> >> "stacktrace" that already exists. This is because when enabled with no
> >> filtering, the lag between typing and seeing what is typed can be up to
> >> 10 seconds or more.
> >
> > Btw., is this true even if frame pointers are enabled? When frame pointers
> > are disabled we scan the full kernel stack => that can be quite slow if
> > every kernel function is traced ;-)
>
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> The function tracer selects Frame pointers :-)
doh, i even added that to begin with ;-)
Life is short but a coder's memory is even shorter.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists