linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090117141453.GA21604@erda.amd.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:14:53 +0100
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

On 17.01.09 14:32:49, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> hm, it seems a bit more complicated than i originally thought.
> 
> trying to reconstruct commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8, i
> found, that resetting counter_width in ppro_setup_ctrs, causes the
> issue. reverting part of the patch, resolved the issue:
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
> @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
>         if (cpu_has_arch_perfmon) {
>                 union cpuid10_eax eax;
>                 eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
> -               if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
> -                       counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
> +//             if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
> +//                     counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
>         }
>  
>         /* clear all counters */
> 
> 
> however, trying to apply this patch to 2.6.28, the behavior is the same
> as before (one NMI) ... so possibly, it is a combination of two bugs,
> with similar symptoms ... 

Tim, could you revert 7c64ade53a6f977d73f16243865c42ceae999aea too?

If this not helps, last chance is
59512900baab03c5629f2ff5efad1d5d4e682ece, but this seems to be save.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/